Shirley C. Agrupis, Chairperson of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), and four other CHED officials are facing a graft and administrative misconduct complaint from the Office of the Ombudsman in connection with the closure of several degree programs at campuses affiliated with a major private higher education network.
The complaint also names Agrupis' chief of staff and three regional directors, who oversee CHED operations throughout the country. The complaint accuses them of violating Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, as well as grave misconduct, oppression, and conduct detrimental to the best interests of the service.
According to the complaint, CHED issued resolutions in early March 2026 ordering the closure or phase-out of several degree programs across the network's three campuses, citing noncompliance with regulatory requirements governing program administration, faculty, and facilities. The institution that runs the affected campuses claims it did not contest the closures. The complaint objects to how CHED handled the public rollout, specifically a series of advisories posted on CHED's official website and Facebook pages that directly named the affected campuses, with public comments left open on the posts.
The complaint claims that because the campuses operate under a single, well-known brand, the public misinterpreted the advisories as signaling the closure of the entire institution, rather than just a few programs at three of its approximately 150 campuses. Campus administrators across the network reportedly received a slew of panicked calls from students, parents, and partner institutions who believed the entire system was closing.
The complaint also alleges that between late April and early May 2026, the institution, through its representative, sent three separate written appeals to Chairperson Agrupis, requesting that CHED coordinate an orderly transition and refrain from further public dissemination while the matter was being resolved. Each letter reportedly received only an automated acknowledgment and no substantive response. Despite these requests, the complaint alleges that CHED re-published the advisories on Facebook in mid-May, this time with comments enabled, causing further reputational and financial harm during a critical enrollment period.
The complaint claims that the resulting damage was significant enough to elicit inquiries from the institution's bank and media coverage, as well as contribute to lost enrollment opportunities that may be difficult to fully recover.
Beyond the handling of its own case, the complaint alleges that CHED has applied regulatory standards unevenly. It cites public statements from a lawmaker and prior news reports indicating that hundreds of teacher education programs across the country were flagged for closure due to licensure exam performance, but were not treated with the same urgency and public scrutiny as the campuses at the center of this complaint. The complainant claims that vigorous, public action in one case and comparative inaction in others is evidence of bias.
The Ombudsman complaint is not the institution's sole legal action. The company has filed a complaint with the Anti-Red Tape Authority over CHED's alleged failure to respond to its appeals. They are also seeking an injunction in a Quezon City trial court to prevent further dissemination of the advisories and recover ₱20 million in moral damages.


.png)














.jpg)

